2. State legislators from Utah and Montana are both trying to find ways to circumvent the 17th amendment, which makes U.S. Senators electable by direct popular vote as opposed to being appointed by State Legistatures as outlined in Article I Section 3. This seems to me to be a pretty straight-forward play for corporate graft, but if someone can give me a realistic pside, I'd like to hear it.
C.H.U.D. Roundtable
Stop hitting yourself.
Previous Posts
- 3. Why is privacy considered a right? Why should...
- DISH OF THE DAY Truth be told, I'm still not cer...
- INANE WEDNESDAY!! 1. How many visigoths does it t...
- 2. Train A starts off going south from Dallas at ...
- 3. Is there really a point to Inane Wednesday? S...
- DISH OF THE DAYI'm just not feeling the hate today...
- MORBID TUESDAY!!1. Saddest/oddest/most shocking c...
- 2. To me, trying to imagine the "experience" of l...
- 3. Can there be an argument in favor of the death...
- DISH OF THE DAYYou cancelled Arrested Development.
Thursday, January 26, 2006
1 Comments:
Ted Kennedy. Rick Santorum. Ted Stevens. Tell me that state legislatures would do a worse job than the people already do electing their senators. I'm not 100% sure that the 17th amaendment was a terribly good idea. As has been evidenced by... well, all of history, people, en masse, are pretty freakin' dumb and the more of them you put together with no breaks in between, to make a decision, the dumber they get. Also, I feel as if a state legislature is far more likely to boot a senator past his prime than an adoring public who just gets used to having the guy.
Post a Comment
<< Home